Knives out for Clean BC

It’s taken sixteen years of incremental policy change in BC but you might have noticed that climate policies are starting to take hold. 

Electric vehicles are widespread, new building standards with much higher energy efficiency are being introduced and heat pump sales have surged as people replace home heating equipment. 

Nonetheless, the long knives are out for the CleanBC climate action plan and the modest gains we’ve made in reducing emissions. This is largely because climate policies inevitably mean phasing out fossil fuels, which is worrying to those in BC profiting from them. 

Case in point: the Business Council of BC, representing big business interests, has raised the alarm that CleanBC will slow the province’s economic growth rate, according to modeling done for the government. These modeling exercises should be taken with a grain of salt as they can only project forward based on the recent (fossil-fueled) past and results depend heavily on the assumptions being made (which are not shown). 

When it comes to economic performance, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is only one indicator. It is a particularly bad measuring stick in failing to account for environmental damages and greenhouse gas emissions.

Ultimately, it is the quality of economic growth that matters, in particular whether the economy is delivering high levels of sustainable employment and reducing inequality. Fossil fuel mega-profits—as we’ve seen in recent years—worsen inequality.

Even at face value, however, the modeling projects that the GDP of fossil fuel industries will still grow by 56% between 2020 and 2030 under a CleanBC scenario, compared to 87% under the “let ‘er rip” reference case (after accounting for inflation). CleanBC isn’t exactly killing the oil and gas industry. 

Meanwhile, the BC United party has committed to scrap the CleanBC plan it says “will kill jobs, kill paycheques, kill billions in funding for vital public services and plunge our province into a recession.”  

If anything, BC’s progress in reducing emissions has been too slow for such a wealthy place in light of the climate emergency we find ourselves in. As of 2021, BC’s greenhouse gas emissions were a mere 3% below 2007 levels and the economy was still emerging from COVID-19 shutdowns that year. 

The consequences of inaction are becoming painfully clear, globally and locally.

We estimated economic costs of $10.6 to $17.1 billion from BC’s 2021 extreme weather trilogy of heat dome, wildfires and floods/landslides. More than 600 people died in the heat dome event, a call to action if ever there was one. 

Despite this, the provincial government remains overly concerned about introducing climate action that affects industry’s “competitiveness,” It has overseen a major expansion of the oil and gas industry, with gas production up 40% in 2022 relative to 2017—when the current government was first elected—and 126% higher than 2007 when BC first legislated GHG reduction targets. 

The BC government has provided rebates on BC’s carbon tax to industrial emitters that meet certain emissions benchmarks, while also recycling industrial carbon tax revenues through a competitive process into new investments that reduce industrial emissions. But as the carbon tax has gone up, so has business’ resistance to change.

In April, the carbon tax for industry will be replaced by a new Output-Based Pricing System that will exempt about half of the emissions from the oil and gas industry from carbon pricing, while allowing for much-discredited carbon offsets towards 30% off their carbon bill. 

BC has also been using BC Hydro to electrify upstream emissions from oil and gas fracking and processing in the Northeast while permitting continued growth of the industry, which causes climate change. A recent announcement of $36 billion in electricity investment by BC Hydro is in large part aimed at providing clean electricity to dirty liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects.

This situation must change and quickly. BC ’s emission reduction targets for the oil and gas sector call for a 33% to 38% reduction by 2030 relative to 2007. Continuing to promote and subsidize fossil fuel production runs counter to this ambitious target.

Getting those emissions down to target levels within six years remains a stretch given current policies. Worse would be letting fossil fuel corporations stab BC’s climate policies in the back. The BC government needs to stop listening to big business and do what’s right for people and the planet.

Topics: Climate change & energy policy